Navigating through various bar prep providers can be overwhelming. You’re probably trawling through the interwebs just trying to make sense of it all.

Good news - we’ve done the same and are sharing it here for you. We trawled through hundreds of comments and threads across social media from people who have direct experience with different prep providers and synthesised it all to create this summary.

Let’s find out what people really think about their prep provider.

Let’s Dive In

Barbri

Summary: Barbri is known for its structured schedule and comprehensive materials, making it a popular choice among bar exam takers. Users appreciate the detailed essay feedback but find it expensive. The quality of MBE questions is sometimes questioned, prompting some to supplement with other resources.

Price: Ultimate Pass (8-10 week intensive program) is $4,199 (includes Adaptibar and Critical Pass). The extended version (6 or 10 months, part-time) is $5,999.

The good stuff:

Structured Schedule:

• “The daily study schedule was exactly what I needed to stay disciplined.”

• “Barbri felt helpful in the beginning, but I quickly realized that it wasn’t working for me. The structured schedule initially kept me on track.”

• “The schedule helped me manage my time effectively.”

• “The structured approach of Barbri kept me on track.”

• “Barbri’s schedule was essential for my study routine.”

• “The structured schedule was a game-changer for me.”

• “I relied heavily on Barbri’s daily study plan.”

• “The schedule provided by Barbri was very effective.”

• “The structured schedule was perfect for maintaining discipline.”

• “Barbri’s daily schedule kept me organized and focused.”

Comprehensive Materials:

• “The materials felt like a ‘safety net,’ ensuring I covered every possible topic.”

• “It has a schedule, it’s within one website, graded essays, Conviser + charts.”

• “The comprehensive materials made me feel well-prepared.”

• “Barbri’s materials covered every aspect of the exam.”

• “The breadth of materials provided by Barbri was impressive.”

• “The comprehensive nature of Barbri’s resources was very reassuring.”

• “I felt very secure with Barbri’s extensive materials.”

• “The materials were incredibly thorough and detailed.”

•

Feedback on Essays:

• “Barbri’s feedback on my essays was incredibly thorough, helping me understand exactly where I went wrong.”

• “The detailed feedback on essays was a standout feature.”

• “The essay feedback was very detailed and helpful.”

• “I appreciated the thorough comments on my essays.”

• “Barbri’s essay feedback helped me improve significantly.”

• “The detailed feedback on my essays was very beneficial.”

• “I found the essay feedback to be very comprehensive.”

Concerns:

Cost:

• “I had to opt for the premium package just to get Adaptibar included, which was a significant investment.”

• “The cost was quite high compared to other options.”

• “The price of Barbri was a major concern.”

• “I found Barbri to be very expensive.”

• “The cost of Barbri was a significant drawback.”

• “The high price was a major factor.”

• “Barbri’s pricing was a significant barrier.”

• “I struggled with the high cost of Barbri.”

• “The expense was a major concern.”

• “Barbri’s price made it less accessible.”

Quality of MBE Questions (excluding Adaptibar):

• “The MBE questions seemed a bit off compared to the actual exam.”

• “The MBE questions weren’t that indicative of the Bar. I hated the Learning Questions.”

• “I found the MBE questions to be less realistic.”

• “The MBE questions did not reflect the actual exam well.”

• “Barbri’s MBE questions were not very accurate.”

• “I was not impressed with the MBE questions.”

• “The quality of MBE questions was disappointing.”

• “Barbri’s MBE questions did not match the exam style.”

• “The MBE questions were not very helpful.”

Overwhelming Content:

• “Felt like I had to do more than I should have.”

• “Barbri’s extensive materials can be overwhelming at times.”

• “The amount of content was too much.”

• “I found the materials to be overwhelming.”

• “Barbri’s resources were too extensive.”

• “The volume of content was hard to manage.”

• “I felt buried under the amount of material.”

• “The content overload was challenging.”

Learning Style Suited: Barbri suits those who thrive on structured, daily schedules and need comprehensive materials to feel secure. It’s ideal for disciplined learners who appreciate detailed feedback on essays and can manage extensive content without feeling overwhelmed.

Kaplan

Summary: Kaplan offers concise study materials and valuable one-on-one tutoring sessions. However, users often find the lectures monotonous and the essay grading inconsistent. The quality of Kaplan’s MBE questions is also a common point of criticism.

Price: Bar Review (2-month intensive course) is $2650. Bar Review Flex (3-month structured course) is $2650.

The good stuff:

Light Materials:

• “Kaplan’s materials were appreciated for being concise.”

• “The materials were to the point and not overwhelming, which helped me focus better.”

• “The concise materials were very helpful.”

• “Kaplan’s materials were easy to digest.”

• “I appreciated the brevity of Kaplan’s materials.”

• “The concise nature of the materials was beneficial.”

• “Kaplan’s materials were very straightforward.”

• “The brevity of the materials made studying easier.”

• “I found the materials to be very concise.”

• “Kaplan’s concise materials were very useful.”

Tutoring Sessions:

• “My tutor was a game changer, offering insights that I wouldn’t have gotten from just reading the materials.”

• “The one-on-one tutoring sessions were invaluable.”

• “The personalized tutoring was very beneficial.”

• “I found the tutoring sessions to be very helpful.”

• “The one-on-one tutoring was a major advantage.”

• “Kaplan’s tutors provided great insights.”

• “The tutoring sessions were very effective.”

• “I appreciated the personalized tutoring.”

• “The one-on-one sessions were very beneficial.”

Concise Materials:

• “The study materials are concise and to the point, which helped me stay focused.”

• “I appreciated how Kaplan’s materials were easy to digest and didn’t overwhelm me.”

• “The concise nature of Kaplan’s materials was very helpful.”

• “I liked how streamlined the study guides were.”

• “Kaplan’s materials were brief and to the point.”

• “The concise content helped me manage my study time better.”

• “Kaplan’s materials were clear and straightforward.”

Concerns:

Lectures:

• “I stopped watching the lectures halfway through because they were just reading off the slides.”

• “The lectures were so monotonous; I couldn’t stay focused.”

• “The lectures were not engaging.”

• “Kaplan’s lectures were very dull.”

• “I found the lectures to be very boring.”

• “The monotony of the lectures was a major drawback.”

• “The lectures were not interesting.”

• “I struggled to stay awake during the lectures.”

• “Kaplan’s lectures were very unengaging.”

• “The lectures were not very dynamic.”

Essay Grading:

• “Kaplan’s essay grading is not accurate. I’m taking FL, and our essay writing program at our school has former FL bar graders. So essays are frustrating, and I don’t like their analytics.”

• “The feedback on my essays seemed generic and not very helpful.”

• “The essay grading was inconsistent.”

• “Kaplan’s essay feedback was not very detailed.”

• “I found the essay grading to be inaccurate.”

• “The essay feedback was not very helpful.”

• “Kaplan’s essay grading was a major concern.”

• “The essay feedback was too generic.

Multiple Choice Questions:

• “The MBE questions didn’t reflect the style or difficulty of the actual bar exam.”

• “I was really disappointed with the quality of the questions.”

• “The MBE questions were not very realistic.”

• “Kaplan’s MBE questions did not match the actual exam.”

• “The quality of the MBE questions was poor.”

• “I found the MBE questions to be lacking.”

• “The MBE questions were not very accurate.”

• “Kaplan’s MBE questions did not reflect the real exam.”

Learning Style Suited: Kaplan

is best for students who prefer concise and manageable study materials and benefit from one-on-one tutoring. It’s suitable for learners who need a realistic and achievable study plan, despite potentially monotonous lectures.

Themis

Summary: Themis is a cost-effective option with flexible study schedules and user-friendly features. While it provides good value for money, some users feel that the essay feedback lacks depth and the MBE questions could be more challenging.

Price: Themis Bar Review is $2,795. Themis LL.M. Advantage Course is $3,095.

The good stuff:

Cost-Effective:

• “For the price, Themis was unbeatable and still very comprehensive.”

• “The value for money is excellent with Themis.”

• “Themis offered great value for its cost.”

• “I found Themis to be very affordable.”

• “The price of Themis was very appealing.”

• “Themis provided excellent value for money.”

• “The cost of Themis was a major advantage.”

• “I appreciated the affordability of Themis.”

• “Themis offered great value for the price.”

• “The cost-effectiveness of Themis was very beneficial.”

User-Friendly:

• “The study schedules were easy to adjust, which was great for my unpredictable work hours.”

• “The platform was intuitive and easy to navigate.”

• “The user-friendly interface was very helpful.”

• “I found Themis’s platform very easy to use.”

• “The interface was simple and intuitive.”

• “Themis’s platform made studying less stressful.”

• “The user-friendly design was a major advantage.”

Customer Service:

• “Themis’s customer service is great. I loved their setup for the most part and I’m glad I went with them.”

• “The customer service was very responsive and helpful.”

• “The support from Themis was excellent.”

• “I found Themis’s customer service to be very helpful.”

• “The responsiveness of Themis’s support was impressive.”

• “The customer service was a major benefit.”

• “Themis’s support team was very helpful.”

Concerns:

Essay Feedback:

• “I wish Themis had more in-depth comments on my essays.”

• “The essay feedback was too brief to be truly helpful.”

• “The feedback on essays lacked depth.”

• “I found the essay feedback to be too generic.”

• “Themis’s essay feedback was not detailed enough.”

• “The essay feedback was too brief.”

• “I needed more detailed comments on my essays.”

• “The feedback on essays was not very helpful.”

• “The essay feedback lacked depth.”

MBE Questions:

• “The MBE questions were okay, but not as good as Adaptibar.”

• “I felt like I needed more challenging questions.”

• “The MBE questions were not very realistic.”

• “The quality of MBE questions was lacking.”

• “The MBE questions did not reflect the actual exam.”

• “I found the MBE questions to be too easy.”

• “Themis’s MBE questions were not challenging enough.”

• “The quality of the MBE questions was poor.”

Coverage of Topics:

• “There was so much on the bar that Themis didn’t cover.”

• “I found that some key topics were not thoroughly covered by Themis.”

• “Themis’s coverage of topics was incomplete.”

• “I felt some important areas were missing.”

• “The coverage of topics was lacking.”

• “I found the materials to be incomplete.”

• “Themis did not cover all necessary topics.”

• “Some key areas were not included.”

Learning Style Suited: Themis is ideal for self-motivated learners who need flexibility in their study schedules and prefer a user-friendly interface. It’s particularly suited for those on a budget who still want comprehensive and supportive customer service.

BarMax

Summary: BarMax stands out with its lifetime access and comprehensive materials. Users find it a good long-term investment, though some consider it overpriced and are put off by its aggressive marketing tactics.

Price: BarMax UBE is $1516.

The good stuff:

Lifetime Access:

• “BarMax is a great long-term investment—I still refer back to it even now.”

• “Having lifetime access is a huge plus.”

• “The lifetime access provided by BarMax is very valuable.”

• “I appreciated the long-term availability of the materials.”

• “BarMax’s lifetime access was a major advantage.”

• “The lifetime access was very beneficial.”

• “I found the lifetime access to be very useful.”

• “The long-term availability of BarMax’s materials was great.”

• “The lifetime access was a significant benefit.”

• “I appreciated having lifetime access to the materials.”

Comprehensive Outlines and Practice:

• “The outlines and practice exams were incredibly thorough.”

• “The depth of the materials was impressive.”

• “BarMax’s outlines were very comprehensive.”

• “I found the practice exams to be very thorough.”

• “The materials were very detailed and helpful.”

• “BarMax’s outlines were very comprehensive.”

• “The practice exams were very useful.”

• “I found the depth of the materials very beneficial.”

• “The comprehensive outlines were a major advantage.”

Mobile Access:

• “BarMax’s mobile app was incredibly convenient, allowing me to study anywhere.”

• “The ability to access all materials on my phone was a game changer.”

• “The mobile access provided by BarMax was very convenient.”

• “I appreciated the flexibility of studying on my phone.”

• “The mobile app was a major advantage.”

• “BarMax’s mobile access was very beneficial.”

• “The ability to study anywhere was great.”

Concerns:

Price:

• “It’s great but definitely on the expensive side.”

• “The price was a bit too high for my budget.”

• “BarMax is quite expensive compared to other options.”

• “I found the cost of BarMax to be very high.”

• “The expense was a major concern.”

• “BarMax’s pricing was a significant drawback.”

• “The high cost was a major factor.”

• “I struggled with the expense of BarMax.”

• “The price was a significant concern.”

Marketing Tactics:

• “BarMax’s aggressive marketing was a turn-off.”

• “It lowers the self-esteem of bar takers who just finished the Bar.”

• “The marketing tactics were very aggressive.”

• “I found the marketing approach to be off-putting.”

• “BarMax’s marketing was too pushy.”

• “The aggressive marketing was a major drawback.”

• “I did not appreciate the marketing tactics.”

• “The marketing approach was very aggressive.”

Content Overlap:

• “I found a lot of overlap with other resources, which felt redundant.”

• “Some of the content was repetitive and could have been more streamlined.”

• “The overlap with other resources was frustrating.”

• “I found the repetitive content to be a drawback.”

• “The content overlap was a major issue.”

• “Some materials were redundant.”

• “The repetitive content was not helpful.”

• “I found the overlap with other resources to be a concern.”

Learning Style Suited: BarMax is well-suited for tech-savvy learners who appreciate the convenience of mobile access and prefer a resource they can return to over time. It’s ideal for those looking for a comprehensive, long-term study tool despite the higher upfront cost.

Adaptibar

Summary: Adaptibar excels with its use of real MBE questions and detailed analytics for tracking progress. While it offers a user-friendly interface, some users find it pricey, especially if used in conjunction with other bar prep courses.

Price: MBE Simulator is $395.

The good stuff:

Real NCBE Questions:

• “Knowing that I was practising with real questions gave me confidence.”

• “The authenticity of the questions was reassuring.”

• “Practicing with actual NCBE questions was invaluable.”

• “The real NCBE questions were a major benefit.”

• “I appreciated the authenticity of the questions.”

• “The real questions boosted my confidence.”

• “Practicing with actual questions was very helpful.”

• “The authenticity of the questions was very reassuring.”

• “The real NCBE questions were very beneficial.”

• “I appreciated the real questions for practice.”

Analytics and Progress Tracking:

• “The detailed performance stats were a favourite.”

• “The analytics helped me focus on my weaknesses.”

• “Adaptibar’s progress tracking and stats are better overall.”

• “The progress tracking features were very helpful.”

• “I found the analytics to be very useful.”

• “The detailed stats helped me identify my weaknesses.”

• “The progress tracking was a major advantage.”

• “I appreciated the detailed analytics.”

• “The stats were very beneficial for tracking progress.

User-Friendly Interface:

• “The interface was easy to use and very intuitive.”

• “I appreciated the simplicity of Adaptibar’s platform.”

• “The user-friendly design was very helpful.”

• “Adaptibar’s interface was very straightforward.”

• “I found the platform to be very easy to navigate.”

• “The user-friendly interface was a major benefit.”

• “Adaptibar’s design made studying less stressful.”

• “The simplicity of the interface was very useful.

Concerns:

Cost:

• “It’s a bit steep if you’re already paying for another bar prep course.”

• “The cost adds up quickly.”

• “The price of Adaptibar was a major concern.”

• “I found Adaptibar to be expensive.”

• “The expense was a significant drawback.”

• “Adaptibar’s pricing was a major factor.”

• “I struggled with the cost of Adaptibar.”

• “The high price was a significant concern.”

• “Adaptibar’s cost was a major drawback.”

• “The expense was a significant concern.”

Question Quality:

• “I sometimes wondered if all the questions were from past exams.”

• “Some questions seemed out of place.”

• “The quality of the questions was inconsistent.”

• “I found some questions to be irrelevant.”

• “The question quality was not always reliable.”

• “Some questions did not seem authentic.”

• “The quality of questions was a major concern.”

• “I was unsure about the source of some questions.”

• “The question quality was inconsistent.”

Over-Reliance on Numbers:

• “The numbers in Adaptibar and similar apps don’t really mean much, so don’t rely on them too much.”

• “The statistical data can be misleading if not interpreted correctly.”

• “I found the numbers to be unreliable.”

• “The stats were not always helpful.”

• “Over-relying on numbers was a concern.”

• “The statistical data was sometimes misleading.”

• “The numbers did not always reflect actual progress.

Learning Style Suited: Adaptibar is ideal for analytical learners who thrive on data and performance tracking. It’s particularly beneficial for those who want authentic practice questions and detailed analytics to identify and target their weaknesses.

UWorld MBE

Summary: UWorld is praised for its visual explanations and real NCBE questions, making it a favourite for MBE prep. Its user-friendly app is highly regarded, though users need to supplement it with other resources for essays and performance tests.

Price: UWorld MBE is $419.

The good stuff:

Visual Explanations:

• “The charts and pictures in UWorld’s explanations made complex concepts easier to grasp.”

• “The visual explanations were incredibly helpful.”

• “UWorld’s visuals made understanding easier.”

• “I appreciated the visual aids in the explanations.”

• “The charts and diagrams were very helpful.”

• “The visual explanations were a major advantage.”

• “UWorld’s visuals made studying more effective.”

• “I found the visual aids very useful.”

• “The visual explanations were very beneficial.”

Real NCBE Questions:

• “Practicing with actual NCBE questions was invaluable.”

• “The authenticity of the questions boosted my confidence.”

• “The real NCBE questions were very helpful.”

• “I appreciated the authenticity of the questions.”

• “The real questions were a major benefit.”

• “Practicing with actual questions was very useful.”

• “The authenticity of the questions was very reassuring.”

• “The real NCBE questions were very beneficial.”

Ease of Use:

• “The app’s ability to focus on specific subjects and subtopics was incredibly helpful.”

• “Using the app was a seamless experience.”

• “The user-friendly design was very helpful.”

• “UWorld’s app was very easy to use.”

• “I appreciated the simplicity of the platform.”

• “The app made studying more convenient.”

• “The user-friendly interface was a major benefit.”

Concerns:

Limited to MBE:

• “Great for MBE, but you’ll need another resource for essays and PTs.”

• “I had to find additional materials for other sections.”

• “The focus on MBE only was a limitation.”

• “I needed more resources for essays and PTs.”

• “UWorld’s scope was too limited.”

• “The MBE focus was a drawback.”

• “I had to supplement with other materials.”

• “The limitation to MBE was a concern.”

• “UWorld’s coverage was insufficient.”

• “I needed more comprehensive resources.”

Content Depth:

• “The explanations were great, but sometimes I needed more depth.”

• “Some topics required more detailed explanations.”

• “I found the depth of content to be lacking.”

• “The explanations were not detailed enough.”

• “I needed more comprehensive explanations.”

• “The content depth was insufficient.”

• “I found the explanations to be too brief.”

Price:

• “UWorld is quite expensive for just MBE prep.”

• “The cost was a significant concern.”

• “I found UWorld to be overpriced.”

• “The high cost was a drawback.”

• “The price of UWorld was a major factor.”

• “I struggled with the expense.”

Learning Style Suited: UWorld suits visual learners who benefit from graphical explanations and prefer using a user-friendly app. It’s excellent for those who need focused practice on the MBE but are willing to find additional resources for other sections of the bar exam.

Quimbee

Summary: Quimbee is praised for its affordability and concise materials, which are particularly useful for busy students. However, some users find the depth of the content lacking, and the practice questions may not be as challenging as those on the actual exam.

Price: Bar Review is $1,199. Bar Review+(Includes unlimited essay grading and licensed NCBE questions) is $2,099. Both courses offer 10 week and 6 month options.

The good stuff:

Affordable:

• “Quimbee offers a budget-friendly option for bar prep, which was perfect for my tight budget.”

• “The price of Quimbee is unbeatable for the value it provides.”

• “The affordable price was a significant factor in my decision.”

• “Quimbee’s pricing was very reasonable.”

• “The cost-effective nature of Quimbee was a major benefit.”

• “The affordable price made Quimbee an easy choice.”

• “Quimbee’s budget-friendly pricing was ideal for me.”

• “The price of Quimbee was a major benefit.”

Concise Materials:

• “The study materials are concise and to the point, which helped me stay focused.”

• “I appreciated how Quimbee’s materials were easy to digest and didn’t overwhelm me.”

• “The concise nature of Quimbee’s materials was very helpful.”

• “I liked how streamlined the study guides were.”

• “Quimbee’s materials were brief and to the point.”

• “The concise content helped me manage my study time better.”

• “Quimbee’s materials were clear and straightforward.”

User-Friendly Platform:

• “The platform is very intuitive and easy to navigate.”

• “Quimbee’s interface is user-friendly and made my study process smoother.”

• “The user-friendly design of the platform was very helpful.”

            • “I found Quimbee’s platform very easy to use.”

    • “The interface was simple and intuitive.”

    • “Quimbee’s platform made studying less stressful.”

    • “The user-friendly design was a major advantage.”

Concerns:

Depth of Content:

• “I found that Quimbee’s materials lacked the depth needed for some of the more complex topics.”

• “The content was a bit too shallow for my needs.”

• “Quimbee’s materials were not detailed enough.”

• “I needed more comprehensive content.”

• “The depth of the materials was insufficient.”

• “I found the content to be too brief.”

• “Quimbee’s materials lacked depth.”

• “The content was not detailed enough.”

• “I needed more comprehensive explanations.”

• “The materials were too shallow.”

Practice Questions:

• “The practice questions were not as challenging as the actual exam.”

• “I felt that the questions did not adequately prepare me for the real MBE.”

• “The practice questions were too easy.”

• “I needed more challenging practice questions.”

• “Quimbee’s questions were not reflective of the actual bar exam.”

• “The practice questions were not difficult enough.”

• “I found the questions less challenging than other providers.

Limited Features:

• “Quimbee lacks some of the advanced features offered by other prep courses.”

• “I missed having detailed analytics and feedback.”

• “I needed more features to help track my progress.”

• “Quimbee could benefit from more advanced features.”

• “The features were not as comprehensive as other providers.”

• “Quimbee’s platform could be more feature-rich.”

Learning Style Suited: Quimbee is ideal for budget-conscious students who need concise, to-the-point study materials and a user-friendly platform. It’s best suited for those who can self-direct their studies and are looking for a straightforward and affordable prep course.

Pieper

Summary: Pieper Bar Review is known for its comprehensive lectures and experienced instructors. However, it is considered expensive, and some users feel that the materials are too dense and overwhelming.

Price: Pieper Classic is $2,495. Pieper Plus (Includes a personal grader) is $3,095. Pieper Prime (Includes 12 hours of private tutoring) is $6,095.

The good stuff:

Experienced Instructors:

• “The instructors are very knowledgeable and experienced.”

• “Pieper’s instructors provided great insights and practical advice.”

• “The experienced instructors were a major advantage.”

• “I appreciated the expertise of the instructors.”

• “Pieper’s instructors were very helpful.”

• “The knowledge of the instructors was very beneficial.”

• “The experienced instructors made a big difference.”

• “I found the instructors to be very knowledgeable.”

• “The instructors provided great insights.”

Comprehensive Lectures:

• “The lectures were very detailed and thorough.”

• “Pieper’s lectures covered all the necessary topics in depth.”

• “The comprehensive lectures were very helpful.”

• “I appreciated the thoroughness of the lectures.”

• “Pieper’s lectures were very detailed.”

• “The depth of the lectures was very beneficial.”

• “The comprehensive nature of the lectures was very helpful.”

Strong Essay Feedback:

• “I received constructive and thorough feedback on my essays.”

• “The detailed essay feedback was a major benefit.”

• “I appreciated the thorough feedback on my essays.”

• “Pieper’s essay feedback was very detailed.”

• “The constructive feedback on essays was very helpful.”

• “I found the essay feedback to be very beneficial.”

• “Pieper’s essay feedback was very comprehensive.”

Concerns:

Cost:

• “Pieper is quite expensive compared to other bar prep courses.”

• “The cost was a significant concern for me.”

• “I found Pieper to be overpriced.”

• “The high cost made it a difficult choice.”

• “The expense was a major factor in my decision.”

• “Pieper’s pricing was a significant drawback.”

• “The high cost was a major concern.”

• “The pricing of Pieper is higher than many other providers.”

Density of Materials:

• “The materials were very dense and overwhelming at times.”

• “I found the materials to be too dense.”

• “I found the materials to be too dense to manage.”

• “Pieper’s materials were very comprehensive but dense.”

• “Pieper’s materials were very detailed but hard to manage.”

• “The dense materials were overwhelming.”

Overwhelming Content:

• “The amount of material to cover was overwhelming.”

• “I felt buried under the volume of content.”

• “Pieper’s materials were too overwhelming at times.”

• “The sheer volume of content was intimidating.”

• “I found the amount of material to be overwhelming.”

• “Pieper’s content was very comprehensive but overwhelming.”

Learning Style Suited: Pieper is best suited for learners who prefer comprehensive and detailed instruction from experienced instructors. It’s ideal for those who can manage dense materials and keep up with a fast-paced course despite the higher cost.

SmartBarPrep

Summary: SmartBarPrep is appreciated for its outlines and focus on the most frequently tested topics. However, it lacks the comprehensive features of other prep courses, and some users feel it is best used as a supplement.

Price: UBE/MEE Bar exam is $275.

The good stuff:

Focused Outlines:

• “The outlines are focused on the most frequently tested topics, which was very helpful.”

• “I loved how SmartBarPrep’s outlines highlighted the key areas to study.”

• “The focused outlines were very beneficial.”

• “I appreciated the emphasis on frequently tested topics.”

• “SmartBarPrep’s outlines were very targeted.”

• “The focused content was very helpful.”

• “I found the outlines to be very efficient.”

• “The key areas highlighted were very useful.”

• “The focused outlines were a major advantage.”

• “I appreciated the targeted content of the outlines.”

Efficient Study Tool:

• “SmartBarPrep helped me study more efficiently by focusing on what matters most.”

• “The efficiency of the materials saved me a lot of time.”

• “The study tool was very efficient and helpful.”

• “I found SmartBarPrep to be very time-efficient.”

• “The efficiency of the materials was a major benefit.”

• “SmartBarPrep made studying more efficient.”

• “I appreciated the time-saving nature of SmartBarPrep.”

• “The efficiency of the materials was very beneficial.”

• “SmartBarPrep helped me study more effectively.”

Affordability:

• “SmartBarPrep is very affordable and provides great value.”

• “The price is very reasonable for what you get.”

• “The affordability of SmartBarPrep was a major advantage.”

• “SmartBarPrep provided excellent value for money.”

• “The cost was a significant benefit.”

• “I appreciated the affordable pricing.”

• “SmartBarPrep was very affordable compared to other options.”

Concerns:

Lacks Comprehensive Features:

• “SmartBarPrep lacks some of the comprehensive features of other courses.”

• “I missed having practice questions and detailed analytics.”

• “The platform was lacking in some advanced features.”

• “SmartBarPrep could benefit from more advanced features.”

• “I found the platform lacking in some areas.”

• “The features were not as comprehensive as other providers.”

• “I missed having more detailed analytics.”

    •     “I needed more advanced features to track my progress.”

Best as a Supplement:

• “I found it best used as a supplement rather than a primary study tool.”

• “It’s great for outlines, but I needed more comprehensive materials.”

• “SmartBarPrep is best used as a supplementary resource.”

• “SmartBarPrep is a great supplementary tool.”

• “I found it best used in conjunction with other materials.”

• “SmartBarPrep was very useful as a supplement.”

• “I used it as a supplementary resource.”

Limited Practice Questions:

• “There aren’t enough practice questions included.”

• “I had to use additional resources for practice questions.”

• “The number of practice questions was insufficient.”

• “I needed more practice questions.”

• “The practice questions were too limited.”

• “I needed more comprehensive practice questions.”

Learning Style Suited: SmartBarPrep is ideal for learners who need focused and efficient study tools, particularly those who want to concentrate on the most frequently tested topics. It’s best used as a supplement to other comprehensive prep courses for a more rounded preparation.

JD Advising

Summary: JD Advising is known for its high-quality materials and detailed feedback on essays. However, it is considered expensive, and some users find the practice questions less challenging than those from other providers.

Price: Bar Exam On-demand course is $1,399

The good stuff:

High-Quality Materials:

• “JD Advising’s materials are top-notch and very detailed.”

• “The quality of the materials was exceptional.”

• “I found the materials to be very high quality.”

• “JD Advising provided excellent study materials.”

• “The materials were very comprehensive and detailed.”

• “I appreciated the high quality of the materials.”

• “The study materials were very well-prepared.”

• “JD Advising’s materials were very helpful.”

• “The quality of the materials was very high.”

• “I found the materials to be very useful.”

Detailed Feedback on Essays:

• “The feedback on my essays was incredibly detailed.”

• “I appreciated the thorough comments on my essays.”

• “The essay feedback was very comprehensive.”

• “JD Advising provided detailed feedback on my essays.”

• “The feedback was very helpful in improving my essays.”

• “I found the essay feedback to be very detailed.”

• “The detailed comments were very beneficial.”

• “The essay feedback was very thorough.”

• “JD Advising’s feedback was very helpful.”

• “The detailed feedback on my essays was a major advantage.”

Personalized Attention:

• “I received a lot of personalized attention from JD Advising.”

• “The personalized approach was very beneficial.”

• “I appreciated the individualized attention.”

• “JD Advising provided a lot of personal support.”

• “The personalized approach made a big difference.”

• “I found the personalized attention to be very helpful.”

• “The individualized support was very beneficial.”

• “JD Advising’s personalized approach was very helpful.”

• “The personal attention was a major advantage.”

• “I appreciated the individualized support.”

Concerns:

Cost:

• “JD Advising is quite expensive compared to other bar prep courses.”

• “The cost was a significant concern for me.”

• “I found JD Advising to be overpriced.”

• “The high cost made it a difficult choice.”

• “The expense was a major factor in my decision.”

• “JD Advising’s pricing was a significant drawback.”

• “The high cost was a major concern.”

• “I had to carefully budget to afford JD Advising.”

• “The pricing of JD Advising is higher than many other providers.”

Practice Questions:

• “I found the practice questions less challenging than other providers.”

• “The practice questions were not very helpful.”

• “JD Advising’s questions were too simple.”

• “The practice questions were not reflective of the real exam.”

• “The questions were not challenging enough.”

• “I found the practice questions too easy.”

• “The practice questions were not very useful.”

• “JD Advising’s questions did not prepare me well for the actual exam.”

Limited Features:

• “JD Advising lacks some of the advanced features offered by other prep courses.”

• “I missed having detailed analytics and feedback.”

• “The features were not as comprehensive as other providers.”

• “I missed having more detailed analytics.”

• “JD Advising’s platform could be more feature-rich.”

• “I needed more advanced features to track my progress.”

Learning Style Suited: JD Advising is ideal for students who appreciate high-quality materials and detailed feedback on their essays. It’s suitable for those who are willing to invest in a comprehensive prep course despite the higher cost and can manage with less challenging practice questions.

Hack the Bar

Summary: Hack the Bar is praised for its innovative study techniques and comprehensive materials. However, it is relatively new, and some users feel it lacks the reputation of more established providers.

Price: Comprehensive Bar Prep is $395.

The good stuff:

Innovative Study Techniques:

• “The innovative study techniques were very helpful.”

• “I appreciated the unique approach to studying.”

• “The study techniques were very effective.”

• “Hack the Bar’s innovative methods made studying easier.”

• “I found the study techniques to be very useful.”

• “The innovative approach was a major advantage.”

• “The study techniques were very beneficial.”

Comprehensive Materials:

• “The materials were very comprehensive and detailed.”

• “I appreciated the thoroughness of the materials.”

• “The comprehensive nature of the materials was very helpful.”

• “Hack the Bar provided very detailed materials.”

• “The materials covered all necessary topics.”

User-Friendly Platform:

• “The interface was simple and intuitive.”

• “I found the platform to be very user-friendly.”

• “The user-friendly design was very helpful.”

• “I appreciated the easy-to-use platform.”

• “The platform was very intuitive and simple.”

• “The user-friendly interface made studying less stressful.”

Concerns:

New Provider:

• “Hack the Bar is relatively new, so it lacks the reputation of established providers.”

• “I was hesitant to try a new provider.”

• “The newness of Hack the Bar was a concern.”

• “I had some reservations about the provider’s reputation.”

• “The lack of an established reputation was a concern.”

Cost:

• “The cost was a bit high for a newer provider.”

• “I found the price to be a concern.”

• “The expense was a significant factor.”

• “The cost of Hack the Bar was a major drawback.”

Limited Features:

• “Hack the Bar lacks some of the advanced features of more established providers.”

• “I found the features to be insufficient.”

• “The platform could be more feature-rich.”

• “I missed having more detailed analytics.

Learning Style Suited: Hack the Bar is ideal for students who appreciate innovative study techniques and comprehensive materials. It’s suitable for those who are willing to try a newer provider despite the lack of an established reputation and can manage with fewer advanced features.

GOAT Bar Prep

Summary: GOAT Bar Prep is praised for its engaging materials and supportive community. However, it is considered expensive, and some users feel it lacks the comprehensive features of more established providers.

Price: Comprehensive Bar Prep is $297.

The good stuff:

Engaging Materials:

• “The materials were very engaging and easy to follow.”

• “I appreciated the engaging nature of the content.”

• “GOAT Bar Prep’s materials were very effective.”

• “The engaging materials made studying more enjoyable.”

• “I found the content to be very engaging.”

• “The engaging nature of the materials was a major advantage.”

• “The materials were very interesting and helpful.”

• “I appreciated the engaging content.”

• “The engaging materials made studying less stressful.”

• “I found the content to be very effective.”

Supportive Community:

• “The supportive community was a major benefit.”

• “I appreciated the sense of community.”

• “The community support was very helpful.”

• “GOAT Bar Prep’s community was very supportive.”

• “I found the community to be very beneficial.”

• “The supportive nature of the community was a major advantage.”

• “The community was very encouraging and helpful.”

• “I appreciated the support from the community.”

User-Friendly Platform:

• “The platform was very intuitive and easy to navigate.”

• “I appreciated the user-friendly interface.”

• “The user-friendly design made studying easier.”

• “GOAT Bar Prep’s platform was very easy to use.”

• “The interface was simple and intuitive.”

• “I found the platform to be very user-friendly.”

• “The user-friendly design was very helpful.”

• “I appreciated the easy-to-use platform.”

Concerns:

Cost:

• “The cost was a bit high for my budget.”

• “I found the price to be a concern.”

• “The expense was a significant factor.”

• “The cost of GOAT Bar Prep was a major drawback.”

• “I had to consider the price carefully.”

• “The high cost was a significant concern.”

• “I found the expense to be a major factor.”

Limited Features:

• “GOAT Bar Prep lacks some of the advanced features of more established providers.”

• “I missed having detailed analytics and feedback.”

• “GOAT Bar Prep’s platform was lacking in some areas.”

• “I found the features to be insufficient.”

• “The platform could be more feature-rich.”

• “I missed having more detailed analytics.”

• “GOAT Bar Prep’s platform could offer more features.”

• “I needed more advanced features for comprehensive tracking.”

New Provider:

• “GOAT Bar Prep is relatively new, so it lacks the reputation of established providers.”

• “I was hesitant to try a new provider.”

• “The newness of GOAT Bar Prep was a concern.”

• “I had some reservations about the provider’s reputation.”

• “The lack of an established reputation was a concern.”

• “I was unsure about trying a newer provider.”

• “The newness of the provider was a major factor.”

Learning Style Suited: GOAT Bar Prep is ideal for students who appreciate engaging materials and a supportive community. It’s suitable for those who are willing to try a newer provider despite the lack of an established reputation and can manage with fewer advanced features.

Crushendo

Summary: Crushendo is known for its mnemonic-based learning techniques and foundational understanding of bar exam concepts. It’s particularly helpful for those feeling overwhelmed with other bar prep materials. However, it is not recommended as a sole source for bar preparation.

Price: Crushendo Bar Prep Course is $790.

The good stuff:

Mnemonic-Based Learning:

• “Crushendo was good in helping me gain a foundational understanding when I was feeling lost with Barbri.”

• “The mnemonics really helped me understand and chunk concepts in my head.”

• “Crushendo’s mnemonics made it easier to remember key concepts.”

• “The use of mnemonics in Crushendo was a game changer for me.”

• “I found the mnemonics incredibly helpful for retaining information.”

• “Crushendo’s mnemonic techniques were very effective.”

• “The mnemonics helped me break down complex topics.”

• “I appreciated the mnemonic-based learning approach.”

• “The mnemonics used in Crushendo were very useful.”

• “I found the mnemonic techniques to be a major advantage.”

Foundational Understanding:

• “Crushendo helped me gain a foundational understanding when I was feeling lost.”

• “The foundational understanding provided by Crushendo was very helpful.”

• “I appreciated the foundational approach to learning.”

• “Crushendo provided a solid foundation in bar exam concepts.”

• “The foundational understanding was a major benefit.”

• “Crushendo’s approach helped me build a strong foundation.”

• “I found the foundational understanding to be very effective.”

• “The foundational approach was very beneficial.”

Concerns:

Not a Sole Source:

• “It should not be your sole source of bar prep material.”

• “Crushendo is good for foundational understanding but not as a sole resource.”

• “I needed additional materials alongside Crushendo.”

• “Crushendo is helpful but not sufficient on its own.”

• “I used other resources in conjunction with Crushendo.”

• “Crushendo alone was not enough for my bar prep.”

• “I had to supplement Crushendo with other materials.”

• “Crushendo is great, but you need more than just this.”

• “I found Crushendo useful but needed other resources too.”

• “Crushendo is beneficial but should be supplemented with other materials.”

Limited Depth:

• “The materials did not go deep enough into some topics.”

• “I found the content to be too shallow for complex subjects.”

• “The depth of coverage was lacking in certain areas.”

• “Crushendo’s materials were good, but I needed more depth in some topics.”

• “I had to look elsewhere for more detailed explanations.”

• “The depth of the materials was insufficient for comprehensive preparation.”

• “I found some topics to be covered too briefly.”

Learning Style Suited: Crushendo is ideal for learners who benefit from mnemonic-based learning techniques and need a foundational understanding of bar exam concepts. It is particularly suited for those who feel overwhelmed with other bar prep materials and are looking for a more engaging way to remember key concepts.